digitalcourage.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Diese Instanz wird betrieben von Digitalcourage e.V. für die Allgemeinheit. Damit wir das nachhaltig tun können, erheben wir einen jährlichen Vorausbeitrag von 1€/Monat per SEPA-Lastschrifteinzug.

Server stats:

830
active users

#OSA

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

Well, @openrightsgroup, at least I got a reply from my MP about the #OSA

NOTE: due to the character limit in alt-text, I have had to shorten the 1st and 2nd pages, so the text is missing important detail.

She mentions a URL which I have not read yet:

ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/ill

At least she took the time to write a decent response, although it didn't address all my problems with it.
I will take some time and try and write a reply.

Continued thread

VPNs protect families, businesses and democracy.

They keep NHS data secure, help parents manage online risks, and give people in repressive states access to news.

Treating VPNs as a “problem” is misguided. Attacking them is an exercise in throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Efforts should focus on educational measures for young people and regulating the age verification industry.

Continued thread

VPNs aren’t a meaningful threat to age assurance.

⚫ 6–12 year olds are very unlikely to use them, due to technological and economic barriers.

⚫ Older teens already know other workarounds. For these teenagers educational rather than ineffectve technical interventions might be more appropriate.

⚫ Adults use VPNs as they don’t trust unregulated age assurance providers with their personal data.

The UK Online Safety Act is ballooning in scope.

Bumping up 'self-harm' content as a priority offence means these sort of posts will be stripped from social media for adults and kids.

ORG's @JamesBaker explains how this change to the law will result in therapeutic or support content being censored.

Watch now ➡️ peertube.openrightsgroup.org/w

Censorship creeps onwards 🤐

Ignoring issues with the UK Online Safety Act, the government is using Henry VIII powers to engulf more content.

Aimed at blocking 'self-harm' content, algorithms will misidentify support resources and content will vanish behind age gates.

digit.fyi/uk-gov-to-toughen-on

DIGIT · UK Gov to ‘Toughen’ Online Safety Act Against Self-Harm ContentThe UK Government said it will take urgent action to toughen up the Online Safety Act to shield the most vulnerable from dangerous content.
Replied in thread

@neil

I've stated this on the form, but the idea of "having to tell Ofcom" anything is a bit dangerous - sounds like every interactive website would have to register centrally just to exist! That's a significant further escalation from where we are now.

It should be passive, as with the current OSA - you do an assessment which can be made available on request (at least that's my understanding of it)

Continued thread

“Six months into enforcement, #Britain’s techno-solutionist fantasy has crashed into reality with predictable results. Beneficial #online #communities have been obliterated, #VPN adoption has surged 1,400%, and the UK has created a perfect case study for why governments can’t regulate away complex social problems with #algorithmic band-aids and #surveillance theater.”

Well done #Strayan techo Gov. This is what we look forward to 🤪

#OSA / #Australia <tarakiyee.com/the-uks-online-s>

Tara Tarakiyee - Techverständiger · The UK’s Online Safety Act: A Lesson in Technosolutionism
More from tarakiyee