digitalcourage.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Diese Instanz wird betrieben von Digitalcourage e.V. für die Allgemeinheit. Damit wir das nachhaltig tun können, erheben wir einen jährlichen Vorausbeitrag von 1€/Monat per SEPA-Lastschrifteinzug.

Server stats:

836
active users

#fossilfuels

46 posts37 participants1 post today

Dry conditions draw emus to the suburbs

"Wildlife groups say the emus are seeking water due to drought conditions and urge the community to be mindful of the animals' welfare. WIRES had also been saddened to hear reports of children throwing rocks at the wandering emus and urged parents to discourage it." >>
abc.net.au/news/2025-05-02/dro
#birds #emus #BrokenHill #children #cruelty #parenting #FossilFuels #drought

ABC News · Wildlife groups urge caution as dry conditions draw emus to Broken HillBy Oliver Brown

👋 USA. Take a look at what importing our oil is doing to the earth.

"A dizzying bird’s-eye view of #Alberta’s oilsands

It’s the largest bitumen deposit in the world. Mining there is visible from space. And for many Canadians, the #oilsands
are still completely unseen "

#Alberta #USA #FossilFuels

thenarwhal.ca/alberta-oilsands

An aerial view of large machinery digging into black earth in the Alberta oilsands
The Narwhal · A dizzying bird’s-eye view of Alberta’s oilsands | The NarwhalThe Alberta oilsands is the largest bitumen deposit in the world. And for many Canadians, the mining there is still completely unseen

Labour's Tom Hayes getting monstered on Bluesky for this post, over Labour looking the same as the Tories and Reform after their retreat on LGBTQ+ existence.

But again, I'll instead say on 'net zero', the term and idea is simply a sop to fossil capital to allow them to continue to profit from extraction, until the theory in some year in the future, magically carbon dioxide will be fully offset.

And by that time, it will be too late for it to do anything anyway, so they'll have got away with the destruction scot-free.

But what's great for politicians and others pushing this over eliminating fossil capital immediately, is they don't have to worry about it either, as they'll be long gone from the scene by that year too.

"Under the 1970 Clean Air Act, California can receive waivers to enact clean air standards tougher than those set by the federal government because historically it has had the most polluted air in the nation. Federal law also allows other states to adopt California’s standards as their own, under certain circumstances….California has received hundreds of waivers over the years, and none had been presented to Congress for a vote — until now.”

nytimes.com/2025/04/30/climate

An electric truck at the Port of Los Angeles in 2023.
The New York Times · House Votes to Repeal California’s Clean Truck PoliciesBy Lisa Friedman

Protecting Australia's unique ecosystems or extractivism as usual ?

"With one of the highest rates of extinction in the world and more than 7.7 million hectares of threatened species habitat destroyed since 2000, Australia is considered by many to be in a biodiversity crisis...The agenda is entirely geared towards fast-tracking development."
>>
abc.net.au/news/science/2025-0
#BiodiversityCrisis #EPBCAct #Biodiversity #ecosystems #conservation #NaturePositive #NatureNegative #EnvironmentalLaws #FossilFuels #koalas #LoggingImpacts #NSWLogging #governance #failure #extractivism

ABC News · Where Labor and the Coalition stand on nature and environment policies this federal electionBy Peter de Kruijff
Continued thread

One of the most frustrating things about explaining the origins of climate catastrophe in a free market fundamentalist society is getting people to understand that when I say "capitalism is causing climate crisis and will kill billions of people if we don't end it," I'm speaking quite literally. The evidence that capitalism itself, not just fossil fuels (although to be fair, capitalism and the wealth of the ruling class already depends on fossil fuels far more than you've been told) is the driving factor is all around us, it's just rarely reported in focus and with the level of concern it deserves in corporate media; which for both professional and class reasons, are pretty married to capitalism and free market fundamentalist ideology.

Take for example this recent Dartmouth University study demonstrating that just 111 large corporations are responsible for 28 trillion (with a t) dollars worth of climate damage to our shared biosphere.

truthout.org/articles/worlds-t

"In a peer-reviewed paper published in Nature last week, Dartmouth University researchers find that the global economy would be $28 trillion richer if extreme heat caused by climate emissions from the top 111 carbon majors had never happened. This is nearly the equivalent value of a year’s worth of all goods and services created in the U.S., as The Associated Press points out.

Ten top fossil fuel companies, including entities like Chevron, ExxonMobil and Saudi Aramco, are responsible for half of those losses, the study finds.

The study authors say that their goal is to provide a scientific linkage between individual companies and financial losses due to their emissions, in hopes of bolstering efforts to hold polluters accountable for the climate crisis amid a growing wave of climate lawsuits and as more states and lawmakers pursue “polluter pays” laws."

Look, I don't want to give people trying to do something useful to help achieve climate justice a hard time; this study is extremely revealing, even if it does adopt a capitalist framework to describe what is quite frankly mass fucking murder in slow motion. In my experience studies like this have a rather large blind spot towards the human cost of conducting capitalism on a boiling planet where everything, including our governments, is owned by billionaire nazis, so it's likely that these folks are actually underestimating the climate costs of "doing business" for the top corporations they studied.

The larger point here however is that as a society we have already amassed oodles of definitive proof that capitalists are burning the planet and threatening billions of lives for profit, and that evidence is typically only worth a paragraph-long notice in our corporate media publications. Rich people are killing us, billions of us, they're just doing it slowly; that's not a metaphor, and I am being dead serious with you when I say that either capitalism goes, or a planet that can support 8 billion people does. Clearly the free market fundamentalists who run our society on behalf of an obscenely wealthy billionaire ruling class aren't coming to the rescue because the rich people who own them have already made their choice. They're going to slaughter billions of people to keep doing capitalism; the question then becomes - do we as a species intend to let them?

Fires burn from the tops of tall stacks at the Tengiz oil field, operated by a joint venture between the Kazakh government and Chevron, on the northeastern shore of the Caspian Sea on September, 1997, in Tengiz, Kazakhstan.
Truthout · World’s Top 111 Corporations Have Caused $28T in Climate Damages, Study FindsStudy authors seek to attribute climate damages to individual corporate polluters in order to hold them accountable.