Orion Ussner kidder<p>So I've read a bit of <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Bookchin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Bookchin</span></a> 's <a href="https://mas.to/tags/PostScarcity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PostScarcity</span></a> (riddled with historical errors), and then a good chunk of <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Woodcock" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Woodcock</span></a> 's <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Anarchism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Anarchism</span></a> (more interesting, but not convincing), and finally <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Chomsky" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Chomsky</span></a> 's <a href="https://mas.to/tags/OnAnarchism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OnAnarchism</span></a> (the sweet spot).</p><p>Chomsky isn't dogmatic. He lives in the real world and makes pragmatic arguments. Dismantling the state is an ultimate goal, but if you go straight for that, a) people get hurt in the meantime, and b) you fail anyway. Chomsky's anarchism is what I can identify with.</p>