@rooskatoen : probably news like this is considered "too complicated" for "ordinary people".
Or the journalists themselves do not understand it, and fear making errors. Indeed, often when they *do* occasionally report on such topics, often their stories are incomplete, sensational and/or plain wrong.
ICT is treated like "rocket science"; only nerds can understand it.
IMO this is very wrong. Way too few people are interested in ICT fundamentals, and why things are the way they are. All of us depend on it more every day. This makes us unnecessarily vulnerable.
While you don't have to know where the pistons are located in your car's combustion engine, you *do* need to learn to drive a car and know *all* of the traffic rules that apply.
Similarly, most people don't have to be able to write computer programs or implement websites, but their basic knowledge of ICT is insufficient. Computer and software manufacturers have done their extreme best to make everything *look* simple. It's a trick, if not a trap.
Too few people are aware that soon we'll be confronted with EHDS (European Health Data Space) and will be seduced into using EDIW/EUDIW (European Digital Identity Wallet). They will only tell you about the advantages, and most people will buy that. Like they did when internet banking was introduced.
Like ChatControl (and a couple of years ago, Covid apps), such technologies will severely impact our lives. They were pushed by lobbyists (payed by #BigTechIsEvil with endless money) to noob politicians. No fundamental democratic discussion, considering all advantages AND disadvantages, takes place.
B.T.W. such news *is* covered, but on "nerd"-sites only, like https://security.nl and https://tweakers.net.
Unfortunately, for unseasoned readers, on those sites it is hard to distinguish between noise and news that really matters.
On Mastodon, following the right people may help you to gain insight.
@jbz