digitalcourage.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Diese Instanz wird betrieben von Digitalcourage e.V. für die Allgemeinheit. Damit wir das nachhaltig tun können, erheben wir einen jährlichen Vorausbeitrag von 1€/Monat per SEPA-Lastschrifteinzug.

Server stats:

812
active users

#FediModeration

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
KING CONSULT | Kommunikation<p>Laura Seime vom <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://correctiv.social/@correctiv_org" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>correctiv_org</span></a></span> -<a href="https://berlin.social/tags/Faktencheck" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Faktencheck</span></a>-Team im <a href="https://berlin.social/tags/SocialHub" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SocialHub</span></a>-Magazin (<span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@socialhub" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>socialhub</span></a></span>) über ihre Arbeit – inkl. Tipps zum Umgang mit <a href="https://berlin.social/tags/Falschinformationen" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Falschinformationen</span></a>:</p><p>&gt; In einer idealen Welt würden alle <a href="https://berlin.social/tags/SocialMedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SocialMedia</span></a>-Betreibenden alles dafür geben, dass es auf ihren Plattformen mit rechten Dingen zugeht und ein faktenbasierter Diskus<br>herrscht. Aber das ist leider nicht so.</p><p>👉 <a href="https://socialhub.io/wp-content/uploads/SocialHub-Mag-27.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">socialhub.io/wp-content/upload</span><span class="invisible">s/SocialHub-Mag-27.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="https://berlin.social/tags/CORRECTIV" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CORRECTIV</span></a>.Faktencheck:<br><a href="https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">correctiv.org/faktencheck/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://berlin.social/tags/Desinformation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Desinformation</span></a> <a href="https://berlin.social/tags/ContentModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ContentModeration</span></a> <a href="https://berlin.social/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a></p>
MudMobBlocklists
everton137<p>I'm intrigued by some posts I've seen saying that Mastodon, or more generally the Fediverse, has the same problem with minorities that we find widely on traditional social media platforms, especially the big tech ones like x and meta. I disagree if you compare it to the cases where constantly outrageous posts appear on your timeline harming minorities.</p><p>How could technology solve a problem that is inherently caused by human beings? If, at the moment, this federated social media is still not a safe space for minorities, isn't this a good time and a great opportunity to solve the moderation problems while we still have far fewer people active here? Offenders will not cease to exist, and technology can only mitigate the damage they can cause.</p><p>We have a big challenge if this is really going to scale.</p><p><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/fediverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>fediverse</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/minorities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>minorities</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/ContentModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ContentModeration</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a></p>
everton137<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://beaware.live/@BeAware" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>BeAware</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://qoto.org/@askesis" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>askesis</span></a></span> 18 years ago, the University of São Paulo tried to create its own social network platform, the Stoa project <a href="http://stoa.usp.br" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="">stoa.usp.br</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> (it seems abandoned, they don't even have an SSL certificate).</p><p>Indeed, moderation was an issue. As an example, I had my blog and account deleted, because the rector ordered, and I was fired from the development team, due to a misunderstanding. I published a first April joke, that some people believed, and it even ended up in the news. 😂</p><p>Be the way, one of the goals of the project was to be federated and we aimed to connect to other educational and research institutes, using some protocol that allowed that.</p><p>Today I laugh, but there were some tough cases where some people were advocating violence, and our small team (4-5 developers) had to deal with it. I cannot image how it would be in case of a very active system in a university as big as University of São Paulo, that can have hundreds of thousands, if we allow the alumni to join. Or dozens of thousands, if just active members can join. You need a team dedicated to the moderation, which is not trivial.</p><p>P. S. 18 years, not 14, as I initially wrote. Oh, gosh, almost 2 decades!</p><p><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>university</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/decentralization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>decentralization</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/federation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>federation</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/fediverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>fediverse</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a></p>
PaulaToThePeople 😷<p>Why are big Instances bad for the Fediverse?</p><p>It's quite simple: <br>bigger instance -&gt; more moderation work -&gt; need for bigger team -&gt; harder to find consensus within the moderation team -&gt; less strict moderation</p><p>Also:<br>bigger instance -&gt; more different ideologies among userbase -&gt; harder for other instances to decide to block that instance / or greater impact on federation if big instances are blocked</p><p>Additionally small instances can't easily block big instances, because doing so would impact their own userbase a lot and drive even more people to large instances.</p><p>So big instances mean a lot more work for smaller instances, because they have to deal with much more individual bad actors instead of just FediBlocking them in bulk.</p><p>All Fediverse softwares should have a 2k limit for monthly active users, so all instances automatically temporarily close registrations when that limit is reached.</p><p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/FediverseMeta" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediverseMeta</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/BigInstances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BigInstances</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/FediMods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediMods</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/FediBlockMeta" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediBlockMeta</span></a></p>
FinchHaven sfba<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://digitalcourage.social/@sl007" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>sl007</span></a></span> </p><p>But it's fine to call for the extermination of the Palestinian people, en masse?</p><p>That's not a problem for <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a> then</p><p>Got it</p><p>cc <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://digitalcourage.social/@digitalcourage" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>digitalcourage</span></a></span></p>
Sebastian Lasse<p>A CALL FOR ALL <a href="https://digitalcourage.social/tags/FEDIVERSE" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FEDIVERSE</span></a> MODERATORS <br /><a href="https://digitalcourage.social/tags/Israel" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Israel</span></a> <a href="https://digitalcourage.social/tags/Antisemitism" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Antisemitism</span></a> <a href="https://digitalcourage.social/tags/Law" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Law</span></a> </p><p>Please note:<br />According to German Press Agency dpa, today 03:50 GMT, the slogan which I see frequently in my TL and which begins <br />“From the river” <br />is illegal in my country (!)</p><p>It is §130; hatepeech; inciting hatred against &quot;national, racial, religious or ethnic groups&quot;</p><p>Depending on the content, I will report such to the Staatsschutz (German State Protection).</p><p><a href="https://digitalcourage.social/tags/Moderation" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Moderation</span></a> <a href="https://digitalcourage.social/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FediModeration</span></a><br />/ <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://digitalcourage.social/@digitalcourage" class="u-url mention">@<span>digitalcourage</span></a></span></p>
spmatich vk3spm :blobcoffee:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@jerry" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>jerry</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@davep" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>davep</span></a></span> it's a highly fraught task to moderate in such situations. Yet the fediverse isn't some magical realm where humanity has suddenly figured out how to treat people fairly and with respect. It would be amazing if it were, but it would also be something that has never been achieved anywhere else.<br>So if you are in charge of an instance, dont take the criticism to heart. Do what you think is best, and remember that it is better than any non-fedi socials would have done in the same situation. Because you are motivated by a sense of community and you don't have a notion of shareholder value warping your perspective. <a href="https://ioc.exchange/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a> <a href="https://ioc.exchange/tags/DontShootTheModerator" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DontShootTheModerator</span></a> <a href="https://ioc.exchange/tags/Peace" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Peace</span></a></p>
Lukas<p><span class="h-card"><a href="https://dresden.network/@ueckueck" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>ueckueck</span></a></span> <br>Ich würde die Frage aus Interesse mal an<br><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/FediAdmin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediAdmin</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/FediverseModerationsTreff" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediverseModerationsTreff</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/FediModeration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FediModeration</span></a> weitergeben wollen: Könnte eine "Opt-In per User mit Genehmigungsprozess"-Funktion eine Option für Zitierbare Beiträge sein? </p><p>cc: <span class="h-card"><a href="https://nerdculture.de/@ij" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>ij</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://nerdculture.de/@M" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>M</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://nerdculture.de/@kirschwipfel" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>kirschwipfel</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://norden.social/@barning" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>barning</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://bildung.social/@fries" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>fries</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://bildung.social/@ebinger" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>ebinger</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://freiburg.social/@wir" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>wir</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://social.tchncs.de/@milan" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>milan</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://social.tchncs.de/@Cedara" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Cedara</span></a></span></p>