vintage screwlisp account<p><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/UI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/HCI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HCI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/programming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>programming</span></a> aitch, see I have a point about the <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/useability" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>useability</span></a> discussions from cognitive <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/gofai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>gofai</span></a> good-old-fashioned-ai from Sandewall because honestly who else are you expecting me to paraphrase.</p><p>We want computer programs to be smart in the same way humans are smart, but the way we make computer programs use computers is very different to how humans use computers in the first place.</p><p>The idea would be that both computer programs and humans should use literally the same expert systems.</p>