Recent searches
Search options
Orban unbelehrbar: Donnerstag erstmals öffentliche Abstimmung der EU-Innenminister über die #Chatkontrolle! https://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/meetings/jha/2024/12/12/ +++ Jedes Land muss zu Zerstörung des Briefgeheimnisses und sicherer Verschlüsselung Farbe bekennen +++ Kritik von Österreich und Slowenien: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVIII/EU/5949/imfname_11437653.pdf +++ Alle Infos und was du tun kannst: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/beitraege/chatkontrolle/
Orban insists: First public vote of EU Home Affairs Ministers on #ChatControl scheduled for Thursday! https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/jha/2024/12/12/ +++ Silence no more: Which countries will support destroying the privacy of correspondence and secure #encryption? +++ Criticism from Austria and Slovenia: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVIII/EU/5949/imfname_11437653.pdf +++ Is your government opposing #ChatControl yet? https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/
@echo_pbreyer
Two questions: Are govts. shown as opposed to it necessarily opposed to it firmly and for the right reasons and does it make sense to stir up a fuss even in such countries?
@anselmschueler See chatcontrol.eu: "Some governments like Germany e.g. only object to the scanning of encrypted communications, but are fine with the indiscriminate scanning of other private and public communication, with the end of anonymous communication by requiring age verification, or with introducing a minimum age for “risky” communication apps. Also critical governments need to do more, exert their influence in the Council of the EU and agree on a joint list of necessary fundamental changes to the proposal." So yes, it does make sense!