digitalcourage.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Diese Instanz wird betrieben von Digitalcourage e.V. für die Allgemeinheit. Damit wir das nachhaltig tun können, erheben wir einen jährlichen Vorausbeitrag von 1€/Monat per SEPA-Lastschrifteinzug.

Server stats:

830
active users

#fullframe

1 post1 participant0 posts today

There's a reason why #DigitalBacks are not common for #AnalogCameras and why the only ones I've seen for #Film are literally entire back sides and not something shoved to fit inside a 35mm as drop-in...

It's really disappointing cuz at that price I would've expected a real #35mm frame size and maybe something like custom backs to mount like the original #ImBack35 did.

But at that price point and piss-poor quality, Luke is right:

  • Just get an [active] adapter and use #vintage #glass that way instead...

So the LUMIX S9 is a thing now! This is the full-frame camera you want when size matters, but so does image quality.

My review is live on the blog, and there's a video as well up on the tubes for those who can stand listening to my voice for an entire ten minutes!

ewenbell.com/blog/LUMIX_S9_Rev

youtube.com/watch?v=qIxdZ38Fcn

makertube.net/w/151ca89b-4b45-

@ewenbell

Continued thread

I was "doing my research" for a new camera/camera lens combo and checked your images to decide which focal length I like most. (I know, own creativity counts and so on. 😅) However, since I was looking at #apsc and #mft, I ended up searching for the actual and the #fullFrame equivalent focal lengths. Since I was posting my apsc photos with the actual focal length so far, I started wondering about the "correct" way to do this. 😃